Pure visibility: a comparative analysis of the conceptions of Alois Riegl and Heinrich Wölfflin
This article intends to explore the perspective of the Comparative Historiography of Art, analyzing the approaches of two important Art Historians: Alois Riegl (1858- 1905) e Heinrich Wölfflin (1864-1945) e Georges Didi-Huberman (1953). Both art historians examined correspond to a similar intellect...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/visuais/article/view/12014 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This article intends to explore the perspective of the Comparative Historiography of Art, analyzing the approaches of two important Art Historians: Alois Riegl (1858- 1905) e Heinrich Wölfflin (1864-1945) e Georges Didi-Huberman (1953). Both art historians examined correspond to a similar intellectual ambient, since they are not distanced in the time and belong to the same historiography current of analyses of Arte: the Vienna School of Art History. This current, which theory bases are knew as “Theory of the Pure Visibility”, will be de apprehension object of this article. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2447-1313 |