Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review
Aims: to identify and describe the instruments and methods available to evaluate speech articulation, and investigate the evidence of validity and reliability for each of these tests in their target populations. Method: The study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Syste...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/joss/article/view/14992 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1864369061975031808 |
|---|---|
| author | Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia |
| author_facet | Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia |
| author_sort | Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt |
| collection | Portal da Incubadora de Periódicos Científicos, Acadêmicos e Educacionais |
| container_reference | Journal of Speech Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019); 01-35 |
| description | Aims: to identify and describe the instruments and methods available to evaluate speech articulation, and investigate the evidence of validity and reliability for each of these tests in their target populations. Method: The study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two researchers conducted a search of the PubMed and Scopus databases using keywords related to assessment, articulation, assessment methods and speech. Search results were limited to studies involving children and adolescents, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Results: 78% of studies involved children aged 6 years to 9 years 9 months. 28% of articles used instruments to evaluate language and communication as a whole, and detect language disorders using tasks which evaluated specific skills including phonological processing, working memory, automatization of speech production and phonological awareness. Other authors used custom assessment protocols to evaluate the repetition or enunciation of words, sentences and syllables. Only six studies provided validity and normative data for assessment instruments. Conclusion: The majority of studies used commercial or research instruments to evaluate speech articulation. All studies also evaluated speech perception. Psychometric studies were available for most of the instruments used to evaluate speech articulation in the studies reviewed. |
| first_indexed | 2025-10-08T14:28:02Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-article-14992 |
| institution | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| issn | 2236-9740 |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2025-10-08T14:28:02Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-article-149922021-03-16T10:59:28Z Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Speech-language pathology Speech sound disorders Speech Articulation Tests Aims: to identify and describe the instruments and methods available to evaluate speech articulation, and investigate the evidence of validity and reliability for each of these tests in their target populations. Method: The study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two researchers conducted a search of the PubMed and Scopus databases using keywords related to assessment, articulation, assessment methods and speech. Search results were limited to studies involving children and adolescents, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Results: 78% of studies involved children aged 6 years to 9 years 9 months. 28% of articles used instruments to evaluate language and communication as a whole, and detect language disorders using tasks which evaluated specific skills including phonological processing, working memory, automatization of speech production and phonological awareness. Other authors used custom assessment protocols to evaluate the repetition or enunciation of words, sentences and syllables. Only six studies provided validity and normative data for assessment instruments. Conclusion: The majority of studies used commercial or research instruments to evaluate speech articulation. All studies also evaluated speech perception. Psychometric studies were available for most of the instruments used to evaluate speech articulation in the studies reviewed. Aims: to identify and describe the instruments and methods available to evaluate speech articulation, and investigate the evidence of validity and reliability for each of these tests in their target populations. Method: The study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two researchers conducted a search of the PubMed and Scopus databases using keywords related to assessment, articulation, assessment methods and speech. Search results were limited to studies involving children and adolescents, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Results: 78% of studies involved children aged 6 years to 9 years 9 months. 28% of articles used instruments to evaluate language and communication as a whole, and detect language disorders using tasks which evaluated specific skills including phonological processing, working memory, automatization of speech production and phonological awareness. Other authors used custom assessment protocols to evaluate the repetition or enunciation of words, sentences and syllables. Only six studies provided validity and normative data for assessment instruments. Conclusion: The majority of studies used commercial or research instruments to evaluate speech articulation. All studies also evaluated speech perception. Psychometric studies were available for most of the instruments used to evaluate speech articulation in the studies reviewed. Aims: to identify and describe the instruments and methods available to evaluate speech articulation, and investigate the evidence of validity and reliability for each of these tests in their target populations. Method: The study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two researchers conducted a search of the PubMed and Scopus databases using keywords related to assessment, articulation, assessment methods and speech. Search results were limited to studies involving children and adolescents, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Results: 78% of studies involved children aged 6 years to 9 years 9 months. 28% of articles used instruments to evaluate language and communication as a whole, and detect language disorders using tasks which evaluated specific skills including phonological processing, working memory, automatization of speech production and phonological awareness. Other authors used custom assessment protocols to evaluate the repetition or enunciation of words, sentences and syllables. Only six studies provided validity and normative data for assessment instruments. Conclusion: The majority of studies used commercial or research instruments to evaluate speech articulation. All studies also evaluated speech perception. Psychometric studies were available for most of the instruments used to evaluate speech articulation in the studies reviewed. Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2020-08-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Text Texte Texto application/pdf https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/joss/article/view/14992 10.20396/joss.v8i1.14992 Journal of Speech Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019); 01-35 Journal of Speech Science; v. 8 n. 1 (2019); 01-35 2236-9740 eng https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/joss/article/view/14992/10051 Brazil; Contemporary Brésil; Contemporain Brasil; Contemporâneo Copyright (c) 2020 Letícia Bitencourt Uberti, Caroline Rodrigues Portalete, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Marcia Keske-Soares https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| spellingShingle | Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Uberti, Letícia Bitencourt Portalete, Caroline Rodrigues Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso Keske-Soares, Marcia Speech-language pathology Speech sound disorders Speech Articulation Tests Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title | Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title_full | Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title_short | Speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| title_sort | speech articulation assessment tools: a systematic review |
| topic | Speech-language pathology Speech sound disorders Speech Articulation Tests |
| url | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/joss/article/view/14992 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ubertileticiabitencourt speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT portaletecarolinerodrigues speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT pagliarinkarinacarlesso speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT keskesoaresmarcia speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT ubertileticiabitencourt speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT portaletecarolinerodrigues speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT pagliarinkarinacarlesso speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT keskesoaresmarcia speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT ubertileticiabitencourt speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT portaletecarolinerodrigues speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT pagliarinkarinacarlesso speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview AT keskesoaresmarcia speecharticulationassessmenttoolsasystematicreview |
