Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements
Introduction: Knowledge about the principles and requirements for reliable data and repositories, as well as criteria for evaluation, can help institutions in the planning and creation of reliable and quality repositories. Objective: The research aimed to confront the main criteria, requirements and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1864369582530101248 |
|---|---|
| author | Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza |
| author_facet | Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza |
| author_sort | Santos, Daiane Barrili dos |
| collection | Portal da Incubadora de Periódicos Científicos, Acadêmicos e Educacionais |
| container_reference | Brazilian Journal of Digital Preservation; Vol. 4 (2023): Continuous Publication; e023003 |
| description | Introduction: Knowledge about the principles and requirements for reliable data and repositories, as well as criteria for evaluation, can help institutions in the planning and creation of reliable and quality repositories. Objective: The research aimed to confront the main criteria, requirements and principles for evaluating the reliability of research data repositories. Methodology: Four documents were confronted: CoreTrustSeal - Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022; the ACTDR - Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories; the FAIR Principles; and The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Results: Despite the difficulty of carrying out the correspondence work of four documents of different nature, it is possible to establish similar requirements between them. Conclusion: It concluded that the criteria, requirements and principles selected in this study present the desired characteristics for a reliable data repository. The discussion of these criteria, requirements and principles is pertinent to the Brazilian context given the incipience of Brazilian research data repositories. |
| first_indexed | 2025-10-08T14:32:31Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-article-17355 |
| institution | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| issn | 2675-3073 |
| language | por |
| last_indexed | 2025-10-08T14:32:31Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-article-173552023-06-13T19:19:24Z Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements Repositórios de dados de pesquisa: confrontação dos princípios, critérios e requisitos internacionais de avaliação da confiabilidade Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Research data repositories Evaluation of research data repositories Criteria/Requirements Repositórios de dados de pesquisa Avaliação de repositórios de dados de pesquisa Critérios/Requisitos Introduction: Knowledge about the principles and requirements for reliable data and repositories, as well as criteria for evaluation, can help institutions in the planning and creation of reliable and quality repositories. Objective: The research aimed to confront the main criteria, requirements and principles for evaluating the reliability of research data repositories. Methodology: Four documents were confronted: CoreTrustSeal - Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022; the ACTDR - Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories; the FAIR Principles; and The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Results: Despite the difficulty of carrying out the correspondence work of four documents of different nature, it is possible to establish similar requirements between them. Conclusion: It concluded that the criteria, requirements and principles selected in this study present the desired characteristics for a reliable data repository. The discussion of these criteria, requirements and principles is pertinent to the Brazilian context given the incipience of Brazilian research data repositories. Introdução: O conhecimento acerca dos princípios e requisitos para dados e repositórios confiáveis bem como de critérios para avaliação, pode auxiliar as instituições no planejamento e criação de repositórios confiáveis e de qualidade. Objetivo: A pesquisa visou confrontar os principais critérios, requisitos e princípios de avaliação da confiabilidade de repositórios de dados de pesquisa. Metodologia: Foram confrontados o CoreTrustSeal - Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022; o ACTDR - Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories; os FAIR Principles; e The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Resultados: Apesar da dificuldade de realizar o trabalho de correspondência de quatro documentos de natureza distinta, é possível estabelecer requisitos semelhantes entre eles. Conclusão: Conclui-se que os critérios, requisitos e princípios selecionados neste estudo apresentam as características almejadas para um repositório de dados confiável. A discussão destes critérios, requisitos e princípios é pertinente ao contexto brasileiro dada a incipiência dos repositórios de dados de pesquisa brasileiros. Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2023-03-07 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Text Texto application/pdf text/html text/html https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355 10.20396/rebpred.v4i00.17355 Brazilian Journal of Digital Preservation; Vol. 4 (2023): Continuous Publication; e023003 Revista Brasileira de Preservação Digital; Vol. 4 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e023003 Revista Brasileira de Preservação Digital; v. 4 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e023003 2675-3073 por https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355/12352 https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355/12354 https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355/12390 Brazil;Contemporary Brasil; Contemporâneo Copyright (c) 2023 Daiane Barrili dos Santos, Samile Andrea de Souza Vanz (Autor) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Santos, Daiane Barrili dos Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza Research data repositories Evaluation of research data repositories Criteria/Requirements Repositórios de dados de pesquisa Avaliação de repositórios de dados de pesquisa Critérios/Requisitos Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title | Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title_full | Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title_fullStr | Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title_short | Research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| title_sort | research data repository: confrontation of international reliability assessment criteria/requirements |
| topic | Research data repositories Evaluation of research data repositories Criteria/Requirements Repositórios de dados de pesquisa Avaliação de repositórios de dados de pesquisa Critérios/Requisitos |
| url | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/17355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT santosdaianebarrilidos researchdatarepositoryconfrontationofinternationalreliabilityassessmentcriteriarequirements AT vanzsamileandreadesouza researchdatarepositoryconfrontationofinternationalreliabilityassessmentcriteriarequirements AT santosdaianebarrilidos researchdatarepositoryconfrontationofinternationalreliabilityassessmentcriteriarequirements AT vanzsamileandreadesouza researchdatarepositoryconfrontationofinternationalreliabilityassessmentcriteriarequirements AT santosdaianebarrilidos repositoriosdedadosdepesquisaconfrontacaodosprincipioscriterioserequisitosinternacionaisdeavaliacaodaconfiabilidade AT vanzsamileandreadesouza repositoriosdedadosdepesquisaconfrontacaodosprincipioscriterioserequisitosinternacionaisdeavaliacaodaconfiabilidade AT santosdaianebarrilidos repositoriosdedadosdepesquisaconfrontacaodosprincipioscriterioserequisitosinternacionaisdeavaliacaodaconfiabilidade AT vanzsamileandreadesouza repositoriosdedadosdepesquisaconfrontacaodosprincipioscriterioserequisitosinternacionaisdeavaliacaodaconfiabilidade |
