Abstractions, between ideology and science
The opening of Marx’s “Method of the political economy” (1857) offers a paradoxical argument: “It seems to be correct to begin with the real and the concrete, with the real precondition, thus to begin, in economics, with e.g. the population […]. However, on closer examination this proves false”. Sho...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/cma/article/view/19110 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The opening of Marx’s “Method of the political economy” (1857) offers a paradoxical argument: “It seems to be correct to begin with the real and the concrete, with the real precondition, thus to begin, in economics, with e.g. the population […]. However, on closer examination this proves false”. Should we then start with the ideal and abstract? The analysis of this paradox brings us back to the complex relationship between language, ideology and science, which are historically determined in Marxist theory. The notion of ideological horizon offers a key analytical tool to clarify at least the main aspects of the problem. We then discuss to what extent Althussers’ distinction between three kinds of concepts, according to their function in the “theoretical practice” (raw material, instruments and scientific product), contributes to elucidate the question. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0104-9321 |
