Parmênides vs. Górgias: uma polêmica sobre a linguagem

This article intends to show the querrel between Gorgias and Parmenides about the possibility of the ontologic speech. The gorgian treatise On Non-being or On Nature presents itself, in this perspective, as refutation of the "parmenidian triad" being, thinking and saying, expressed in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lopes, Daniel Rossi Nunes
Format: Online
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/phaos/article/view/9528
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article intends to show the querrel between Gorgias and Parmenides about the possibility of the ontologic speech. The gorgian treatise On Non-being or On Nature presents itself, in this perspective, as refutation of the "parmenidian triad" being, thinking and saying, expressed in the Poem. Gorgias intends to prove that the speech concerning being, wich Parmenides considers the only possible and true, is inconsistent, both sintaticly and semanticly. Denying the possibility of an ontologic speech, Gorgias atributes then a central function to rhetoric in the theory of speech.
ISSN:1676-3076